![]() The Aero 15X is a great laptop, improving in the most important ways on our favorite gaming laptop of last year. One other key difference is the Aero 15X offers a 4K panel option-though we recommend sticking to the 1080p 144 Hz panel if gaming is your primary concern.Īll told, this makes for a compelling alternative to the GS65 if you don't mind the slightly more brutalist design. The Aero 15X, on the other hand, sports a 94 Whr battery that lasted upwards of six hours. The GS65's 82 Whr battery lasted about four and a half hours on our streaming video battery test. It's also slightly better suited for professional uses-that is, toting to meetings. Compared to those two, the Aero 15X offers a slightly more professional look, though I prefer the GS65's metal chassis to the plastic feel and sharp edges of the Aero 15X's aluminum shell. Geekbench 5.4.0 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit) Valid. On that note, the Aero 15X's primary competition is MSI's GS65 Stealth Thin and the new and updated Razer Blade. It still has the same 5mm-thin bezel that allows for a 15.6-inch screen in a 14-inch chassis, although that setup is slightly less exciting now that most laptops of this generation have followed suit. On another important front, the 2018 model's screen is upgraded from a 60 Hz to a 144 Hz display, a major improvement.ĭesign-wise, the chassis remains largely the same. The old model lacked anti-ghosting on the keyboard, which resulted in occasional but extremely frustrating double keypresses. Shoppers looking for more affordable options in the near term should consider the previous gen 3060-Ti, which offers excellent real-world performance for $400 USD.Speaking of which, the 2018 Aero 15X fixes one of my biggest gripes with last year's system. Most gamers, who are best off playing at 1080p, should wait for the upcoming, better value, 4060 series cards. Geekbench 5.4.6 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit). PC gamers still looking to join AMD’s “2%” GPU club (Steam stats: 5000/6000 series combined mkt share) need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote inferior products. Benchmark results for a GIGABYTE AERO 16 XE4 with an Intel Core i7-12700H processor. Although the 7900 XTX does outperform the 4070-Ti on paper, the 4070-Ti is more power efficient (quieter), has a broader feature set (RT/DLSS 3.0) and offers far better game compatibility (drivers). Upload Date: Ma05:07 AM: Views: 4: System Information. Geekbench 6.0.0 for Windows AVX2 Result Information. ![]() Top Single-Core Results Top Multi-Core Results Recent Results. Users tempted to consider the 7900 XT/X by AMD’s army of sponsored Advanced Marketers (youtube, reddit, twitter, forums etc.) should be aware that AMD have a history of releasing benchmark busting, heavily marketed, sub standard products. Benchmark results for a GIGABYTE AERO 15 KC with an Intel Core i7-10870H processor. ![]() Since the 4070-Ti only has 12GB-192-bit memory (vs 24GB-384-bit in the 3090-Ti) it is relatively weaker (5-10%) at 4K. The 4070-Ti is around 50% faster than the 3070-Ti and offers similar performance to the 3090-Ti at less than half the price. Geekbench 4.4.4 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit) Result Information. 1,499 at Amazon Pros + 4K, OLED Samsung display + Sturdy, all-aluminum design + Thin-and-light for a gaming laptop + Clicky keyboard + Great overall performance + Slim bezels Cons - Poorly placed. It features 7,680 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.3 / 2.6 GHz, 12 GB of memory, a 192-bit memory bus, 60 3rd gen RT cores, 240 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 (with frame generation), a TDP of 285W and an MSRP of $800 USD. Benchmark results for a GIGABYTE AERO 15-SA with an Intel Core i7-9750H processor. The RTX 4070-Ti is based on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |